More than 25 per hundred of American adults chow down on fast nourishment two or more times each week. renowned for menu pieces encompassing high allowances of fat, sugar, and salt, fast-food bistros have contributed to America's poor diets and advanced risk of diet-related chronic infections, like heart disease and diabetes. A new study financed by the Robert timber Johnson Foundation's Healthy Eating study program and published in the American periodical of Preventive Medicine presents results from a 14-year study indicating that very quick nourishment bistro meal lists have only humbly increased nutritious offerings, and much enhancement is still required.
"Despite qualitative clues that the fast-food industry is making improvements to the nutritional quality of at smallest some of their list pieces, a quantitative evaluation of trends in the nutritional value of very quick food available in the marketplace was lacking," states lead researcher Mary Hearst, PhD, MPH, aide lecturer of Public wellbeing at St. Catherine University in St. Paul, Minnesota. "This is the first study to quantitatively assess if fast-food bistro chains have improved the nutritional value of their U.S. list offerings over a time span of time throughout which they have been encouraged to do so by governmental and nongovernmental agencies."
Hearst and the study group set out to analyze tendencies at eight fast-food bistros utilising facts and figures from 1997/1998 to 2009/2010 culled from the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center nourishment and Nutrient Database, which dwellings meal lists from 22 fast-food bistros. The examiners selected eight bistros:
- McDonald's
- Burger King
- Wendy's
- Taco Bell
- Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC)
- Arby's
- Jack in the Box
- Dairy Queen
Three criteria very resolute bistro selection: Inclusion in the database since 1997; proposing a characterised set of menu pieces (i.e., not offering a kind of "create your own meal"); and addition of all benchmark menu items in the database.
To evaluate nutritional value, researchers relied on the wholesome Eating Index (HEI)-2005, a metric developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and used for quantifying nutritional value. The group expected index scores would drop below the score for the American food provide - 60 points of 100 - due to high fat and sugar and reduced crop and vegetable content. It furthermore anticipated to find an boost in HEI-2005 scores among these bistros over the 14-year time span.
over the eight bistros, the HEI-2005 tally bigger over the 14-year time span. although, the increase was unassuming, from 45 in 1997/1998 to 48 in 2009/2010. KFC showed the greatest improvement with a nine-point increase and Jack in the carton, the second utmost with a seven-point boost.
Over the study time span, tallies did not change for crop, entire crop, total vegetables, dark green and orange vegetables, legumes, total kernels, entire kernels, and oils. although, scores advanced for meat, saturated fat, and calories from solid fats and added sugars. tallies worsened for milk/dairy and sodium.
Six of the eight bistros improved nutritional value reliable with public health recommendations, an important observation for turning around the increasing rates of diet-related chronic infection in the U.S. KFC led the bistros in expanding vegetables and total grains and declining saturated fats and solid fats and supplemented sugars.
The general nutritional value tally affiliated with these eight bistros, 48, dropped below that of the mean American diet in general, 55, which the USDA considers far from optimal.
"Given the function of very quick nourishment in Americans' eating sparingly, bistros are in a unique position to help advance the diet value in the U.S. by improving the nutritional quality of list offerings," concludes Dr. Hearst. "Modest improvements in average nutritional value of menu offerings over eight-fast-food bistro chains were observed, which is reliable with both legislative efforts (e.g., banning trans fat) and the industry's own declarations about conceiving healthier menu options. although, contemplating that very quick nourishment is ubiquitous in the U.S. diet, there is much room for improvement."
In a commentary accompanying the article, Margo G. Wootan, DSc, of the Center for research in the Public Interest, Washington, DC, emphasizes that the nutritional quality of fast nourishment has advanced little, only three points out of the 100-point HEI-2005 scale. She states, "This minute increase is disappointing, and a bit surprising, granted the numerous pronouncements by companies that they have added healthier list choices, switched to healthier preparing food fats, are reducing sodium, and are touting other alterations in business press issues and advertising." Wootan outlines a six-step program for bistros to offer and encourage healthier choices, solidly setting up that they can and must do better than the little improvements Dr. Hearst and her colleagues measured over 14 years.
Fast-Food bistros Still Need To advance Nutritional Quality Of repasts
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น